The Editor

10

Apr

2012

What a bloody mess - The London Elections

Written by Green Arrow

Actually, I believe I may have used this title before to show what a disastrous mess British Nationalism is in at the moment but if it was a mess then, it is a bigger bloody mess now.

Let us have a look at some of the things that are going on in the so called Nationalist and anti-colonisation movements at this moment in time and then when the article is finished, we can all bang our heads against the nearest brick wall in despair.

First off, let us take a look at the Casuals United, a group I once had great expectations of, after they made it clear that they saw through the ZOG puppet and blue eye make-up wearing Irish Tommy Robinson, who has unilaterally declared that he is the leader of the Zionist led English Defence League and puts Israel before the country that has taken him in and who he betrays when he declares that Black People have every right to say they are English.

The Casuals are now calling on their supporters to vote for another immigrant, Turkish Boris Johnson, in order to keep the supreme moslem dhimmi Ken Livingstone - who wants to turn Londonistan into the Islamic centre of Europe - out of power in London.  For Christ's sake, Boris is as bad, if not worse than Livingstone because at least the lizard lover Red Ken is open about his plans for London.  Remember these words from Turkish Boris:

I urge people, particularly during Ramadan, to find out more about Islam, increase your understanding and learning, even fast for a day with your Muslim neighbour and break your fast at the local mosque. I would be very surprised if you didn't find that you share more in common than you thought.

There is only one reason I will ever visit a mosque and not being quite ready yet for becoming a nationalist martyr, I will keep the reason to myself for the moment.  Come on Casuals - start using your brains.

Then visiting the site of the vainest, yet most boring person in the world, to see what new images of himself he has posted, I find that Eddy Rat Butler is again attacking the British National Party on behalf of his new paymasters, the anti-British English Democrats, who also promote the Zionist poison that any person of any colour can be English.

Now the trouble with Butler, is that he has been caught out in so many lies that it is difficult to know when he's telling the truth and when he is not, however I do not doubt that on this occasion, that his revelations that the BNP leadership is full of perverts and crooks is indeed correct.  All of us who have done our homework know that to be true but I do have a problem with his most recent article where he writes this: "scene of the bombing of the Admiral Duncan pub by the ex-BNP member and neo-Nazi terrorist David Copeland."

Come on Butler.  All you are doing here is to try and tarnish the many decent members and ex members of the British National Party as being some kind of extremists, when (perhaps sadly) the truth is all too different.  You know that David Copeland was never really a BNP member at heart, because as Copeland said himself:

“It was funny to hear that people are arguing about me being a member of the BNP. I must admit that I was a member for a few months and didn’t take it seriously. I went to a few meetings …”

In fact Copleland's psychiatrist said at his trial "He went to some of its [the BNP’s] meetings but did not like their adherence to democracy.”

I say this to all you genuine British Nationalists who have taken the English Democracy path and turned their back on Britain - ditch them now and regain your pride and honour.  To support them is to betray your nation and your race.   A pox on the English Democrats and the lying rat Butler.

Now let us turn our attention to the laughable Nation Union of Farmworkers, sorry the Nationalist Unity Forum who led by Andrew Brons led many of you up the garden path for so long and wasted at least a year of our lives offering false hope.  Who do they suggest we vote for in the London Elections?

You guessed it.  The British National Party, the very same political party the individuals who created the NUF have been attempting to destroy for the last 6 years.  Incredible.

They know as well as anyone who understands how the BNP is run, just how rotten and corrupt it is but now they suggest that people help keep the corpse alive by supporting it.

It is like saying that the Russians were better off because they replaced  the Czar with Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin.

By helping to keep the BNP alive, new innocent future patriots will be drawn into it and have their dreams, hopes and wallets drained just as ours were.  Shape up or Ship Out NUF.

Now we turn to one of vilest organisations that claims be a nationalist party.  The anti-British Freedom Party that was spawned from the spew of the likes of the foul mouthed and insane Lee Barnes and supported still by their yapping fraudster, thug, liar and lunatic Web Master, Simon Bennett.

The party now of course, is firmly in the hands of the Zionists and allied to the zionist run EDL under Robinson.

If you judge a person or party by the company they keep or the people they have within it, then the British Freedom Party are now the sump of the political sewer.  For now they are boasting about their new alliance with an organisation called the Libertarian Alliance, that is a key supporter of an organisation that defends child pornography and are proud to promote Dr Sean Gabb who is an outspoken defender of why child pornography should be legal.

This is Dr Sean Gabb writing about the paedophile Gary Glitter and I want you to read his words very carefully.

Or perhaps he really was guilty under the law. We shall never know, as he confessed to possession at the last minute, so the pictures were not shown in court. But let us assume that these pictures were of children. This being so, are there any credible reasons for why possessing them should be illegal? In asking this, I take the standard libertarian position that an act should be criminal only so far as it can be shown to have caused an identifiable individual harm that would be recognised as such by a reasonable person. What harm did Mr Gadd cause to anyone?.........................
But the crime here would not be possession: possession would be no more than evidence of a crime. In any event, there is no claim that he ever knew the models or the photographers. He appears simply to have downloaded them from the Internet.

Another answer is that looking at such pictures somehow encourages attacks on children. There is a vast literature on the alleged inflammatory nature of pornography, and I will not refer to it beyond saying that I have yet to be shown a causal connection between pornography of any kind and sexual violence..............................

An answer still less convincing is that by downloading the pictures, he was somehow encouraging their production. This might be the case had he been paying for them. But I am not aware that he paid for anything. So far as I am aware, he downloaded from various newsgroups and open access web sites. And even if he had paid for some of the pictures, it is hard to see why there should be laws against possession of what he had bought. I have numerous objects in my home that I strongly suspect were made with child labour. This computer is running on electricity that I am sure was generated from coal mined at least partly by Colombian children. In a sense, therefore, I am encouraging the exploitation of children. But I stand no chance of being arrested and put on trial. What is the difference between Mr Gadd—assuming he paid for the pictures—and any of us who pay for children to be treated in a manner that we regard, perhaps rightly, as criminal? Indeed, it can be argued that it is less harmful for a child to be photographed in a warm studio over several hours than to be worked day after day in a factory with unguarded machinery all around

Well all I can say is this to the dwindling members of the Pepsi Cola Party who read the above.  If you do not rip your BFP memberships up today, then you are as guilty as Gary Glitter in my eyes, because any political party that can align itself with paedophile supporting sites is as evil as them.

At this stage I had intended to move on to the British National Party, National Front and Britain First but I find I am late for a very important appointment and so will have to finish this article tomorrow, so please do not start banging your heads against a brick wall until I return to join you.

Share this post