It is clear that at least since the rise of Marxism, a number of Jews have actively been enemies of the Western Societies they have lived in. They have worked by one means or another as the times have shown opportunity – Liberalism, Communism, Socialism, Left Liberalism, Neo-Conservatism etc – to undermine European, Christian rule by stripping it of its democratic majoritarian rights.
These elements have succeeded in their aim of destroying their host European societies to a remarkable degree in recent decades. But contrary to their hopes and expectations, this has not been to their benefit. On the contrary, it has been to their very great disadvantage and will continue to be so.
Perhaps the first significant failure of the Jewish project in the non-Communist post-war world was South Africa. Apartheid was put in place not just to ensure a European future in that country by Balkanising it ethnically and politically but to keep the normally warring Black tribes from killing each other and from destroying civil society. Unfairnesses undoubtedly existed under the system but there were also relatively corruption-free administration and a degree of security and prosperity for all.
Many South African Jewish leftists and liberals such as Jo Slovo, Albie Sachs, Dennis Goldberg, Harry Schwarz and Helen Suzman rallied against the system. They loudly denounced it in literature, the media, academia and as leaders in political organisations like the ANC.
It was ironic to see the Black populace turn on them once the former gained power.
All Jews in South Africa have suffered
Not only have left-wing Jews been marginalised but Jewish businessmen, not noticeably left-wing, have seen themselves as the objects of suspicion and resentment. They have found their business interests undermined. A classic case is the Oppenheimer-dominated Anglo American Corporation. This gold, other metals and diamond mining giant saw the writing on the wall early and beginning in 1961 diversified out of South Africa in order to reduce its reliance on mining in the country. Restructured as Anglo American PLC, its primary listing is now in London rather than Johannesburg.
Following the passing In 2002 of South Africa’s Mining Charter, along with similar companies it was forced to transfer a percentage of its production there to black South Africans and has since ‘empowered’ the latter in its other businesses to the tune of some R26 billions.
'Affirmative Action' lowers Standards
Whites in South Africa, including Jews, are subject to what is euphemistically called ‘affirmative action’ crystallised under the Employment Equity Act, 55 of 1998. This has effectively legitimised what is in practice every bit as much racial discrimination as anything under apartheid. ‘Affirmative action is criticised for establishing a quota system, which involves the setting of targets. This leads to a disuse of, and disregard for merit as a job criterion and a general lowering of standards’. (Sikhosana 1993).
Standards tend to be lowered when quotas are applied because a parity of ability is assumed between the races which does not exist; not just because there may be differing levels of experience but mostly because blacks on average do not possess the aptitudes of whites. In an SPM test, black first year engineering students at the University of Witwatersrand ( many destined for the mining and construction industries as well as maintaining utilities) had a mean IQ of 93 while for whites it was 106 (Rushton et al 2002). In an APM test of a further sample of engineering students, black students scored a mean IQ of 101 while whites scored 15 points higher at 116. (Rushton et al; 2004). Many other tests have given similar results.
The Disintegration of South African Civil Society
South African Blacks make no distinction between Jews and non-Jewish Europeans. Both have white skins and are therefore bracketed together as racial ‘oppressors’ and targets by every level of society from the government, as shown in its 'affirmative action' policies to criminals. Unsurprisingly, at least a quarter of the white population has fled the country, which helps to explain why your UK dentist is likely to be South African. If he isn’t Australian, that is.
The quality of life for the (mostly middle–class) Jews as with other whites has sunk to insufferable levels for many thanks to the rampant crime which the black population also has to endure. For example, Nadine Gordimer, the Jewish Nobel Prize-winning supporter of the ANC was robbed in her own home by a black gang as have innumerable others.
The flavour of life in the country was graphically described by the widow of Alan Paton, the (non-Jewish) founder of the South African Liberal party and author of ‘Cry the Beloved Country’. This influential book attacking apartheid which sold more than 15 million copies and was translated into more than 20 languages became a set book in schools all over the world. After being burgled, hijacked, mugged and terrorised in several incidents by black criminals, she wrote:
‘Why I'm fleeing South Africa - Anne Paton
London Sunday Times 1998
I am leaving South Africa. I have lived here for 35 years, and I shall leave with anguish. My home and my friends are here, but I am terrified. I know I shall be in trouble for saying so, because I am the widow of Alan Paton….
I was so sorry he did not witness the euphoria and love at the time of the election in 1994. But I am glad he is not alive now. He would have been so distressed to see what has happened to his beloved country. [Without Apartheid]
I love this country with a passion, but I cannot live here any more. I can no longer live slung about with panic buttons and gear locks. I am tired of driving with my car windows closed and the doors locked, tired of being afraid of stopping at red lights. I am tired of being constantly on the alert, having that sudden frisson of fear at the sight of a shadow by the gate, of a group of youths approaching—although nine times out of 10 they are innocent of harmful intent. Such is the suspicion that dogs us all.
Among my friends and the friends of my friends, I know of nine people who have been murdered in the past four years. An old friend, an elderly lady, was raped and murdered by someone who broke into her home for no reason at all; another was shot at a garage.
‘A character in Cry, The Beloved Country says: "I have one great fear in my heart, that one day when they are turned to loving they will find we are turned to hating." And so it has come to pass. There is now more racial tension in this country than I have ever known.
‘President Mandela has referred to us (The thousands who are streaming out of the country) as "cowards" and says the country can do without us. So be it.’
South Africa will Decline without its Whites and Jews will Suffer
Despite Mandela's assertions, it is unlikely that South Africa can survive as an advanced society without its intelligent whites. in their absence there seems no good reason why the country should not sink to the levels of inefficency, corruption and failure seen in the rest of sub-Saharan Africa.
The Low Average IQs of South African Blacks means Decline and Social Malfunction
Richard Lynn (2006; p39, 2008; p27) has determined over many tests that the median IQ for South African Indians is 86, for coloureds it is 83 and for blacks it is 69 as against a white mean of 100. In Britain, mental sub-normality was defined historically as having an IQ of 70 or less. Lynn's methodology has been attacked (eg racialreality.blogspot.co.uk/2011/08/devastating-criticism-of-richard-lynn.html), but even his severest critics put the mean sub-Saharan black IQ at no more the 80 or thereabouts
This is still in white European terms 'borderline' subnormality in intellectual functioning (Generally an IQ of 70-85). This, while not amounting to mental retardation is technically 'cognitive impairment'. Persons who fall into this categorization have a relatively normal expression of affect for their age, though their ability to think abstractly is rather limited. Reasoning displays a preference for concrete thinking. They are usually able to function day to day without assistance, including holding down a simple job and the basic responsibilities of maintaining a dwelling.
Thus the average South African black functions at an intellectual level which in white societies does not allow him or her to hold down a job requiring abilities beyond that of a labourer, menial or basic factory worker and is associated in these societies with criminality and other social ills. Such a population cannot sustain overall first world standards.
The Jewish project in South Africa in helping to bring down white rule has been and will be a disaster for advanced, civilised life in that country, just as the originators of Apartheid feared it would be. A disaster for the Jews as well as for whites and many blacks, asians and coloureds as well who will suffer under black 'freedom' as white influence continues to evaporate.
Perhaps though if most whites eventually feel obliged to leave, the Chinese will then step in as they have elsewhere in Africa.
The Jewish Activist Failure Continues…
But the major blow to Jewish hopes has been and will be the multiculturalisation and multiracialisation of Europe and North America. Here, the Jews as a whole will be victims of the success of leftist, liberal or neo-con Jews in bringing about the destruction of the white rule they were so keen on doing in South Africa.
Any doubt that it was indeed Jews who were responsible for this should be dispelled by the words of Britain’s most prominent Jew. in his book. 'The Home we Build Together' Britain’s Chief Rabbi, Jonathan Sacks blames Jews for originating multicultural doctrines. As a result of this policy, Britain's politics had been poisoned by the rise of identity politics, as minorities and aggrieved groups jockeyed first for rights, then for special treatment, each claiming that its pain, injury, oppression and humiliation was greater than that of others.
The process, Sacks said, began with Jews, before being taken up by blacks, women and gays. The effect had been inexorably divisive and stifling of free speech. It threatened liberal democracy. The politics of freedom risked "descending into the politics of fear".
The Importation of Islam as a Threat to all Jews.
All this is true enough, but Sacks did not mention the most corrosive aspect of the multiculti project so far as Jews are concerned (as well as for the rest of us, obviously): the importation of any and all ethnic groups is viciously anti-white and anti-West in intent and includes the most dangerous enemy of our civilisation - and of the Jews; Islam.
It is sometimes difficult for the members of a society which is the product of millennia of Western Christian Civilisation and who, even if they reject it, tend unconsciously to judge their own society by its standards and to impute them to others, readily to grasp that some cultures have attitudes and beliefs which are the polar opposites of what they think of as civilised norms. Islam is one of them.
The Myth of Islamic Tolerance: Mohammed’s Genocide of the Jews.
There are those who believe that the Jews fared better under a 'tolerant' Islam than they did in Europe historically. The race realist (or race-honest) psychologist Richard Lynn mentions the theory in his latest book, 'The Chosen People' that it is possible that Ashkenazi Jews have a relatively high IQ at least partly because only the most intelligent survived European persecution and passed on their genes.
However, notwithstanding that there were periods when Jews were sorely persecuted in Europe, as Serge Trifkovic points out (The Sword of the Prophet), this idea is contradicted by the fact that, in an era when Islam was by its own account more economically advanced and richer than Europe, there were more Jews in Europe than in Islam.
Islam has Persecuted the Jews (as with all Non-Believers) from the Beginning
In fact, persecution of the Jews has been a feature of Islam from the first. When Mohammed early realised that the Jewish tribes of Medina, steeped in the learning of their scriptures, would never accept the message of an illiterate fanatic with only a superficial knowledge of them (as of Christianity) he adopted an attitude of implacable hostility towards them. This eventually involved ‘ethnic cleansing’ and genocide of the Jews throughout Arabia proper who 'disappeared from history'. Trifkovic relates (2002, pps 41/44);
‘The first stage consisted of individual murders of Jews; the second entailed the expulsion of two tribes from Medina; the third was completed with the slaughter of one remaining tribe. Turning against the Banu Qurayzah, the last Jewish tribe in Medina when they refused to convert to Islam, Mohammed ordered 900 men to be beheaded in a ditch in front of their women and children. Torches were lit so that the slaughter could be over in one day.
‘Truly, the judgement of Allah was pronounced on high’ remarked Mohammed, the ‘perfect man’ and exemplar to Muslims. Other men; fathers, sons, brothers, were enslaved, tortured or crucified.
The women were subsequently raped. Mohammed chose as his concubine one Raihana bint Amr, whose father and husband he had had slaughtered before her eyes only hours earlier. Such treatment had already been sanctioned by one of Mohammed’s fortuitous prophetic revelations.
Non-Muslims as Inferior: The Institution of Dhimmitude
Islam conceived of its mission in the world as bringing it under the domination of itself. In its first centuries, huge swathes of territory were conquered in the Jihad effort to free men from unbelief. Ironically, Jihad became a device to deprive men of their freedom.
While it vanquished kufr (unbelief) by bringing enslavement and death to unbelievers, it allowed Judaism and Christianity; the ‘lower monotheisms’, certain inferior rights. They were excused from the categories of the enslavable by ‘a concession which acknowledges their place in the ascending line of prophecy culminating in the revelation of Islam’
- Jihad and the Ideology of Enslavement. John Ralph Willis. The Legacy of Jihad, Ed. Andrew G Bostom. 2005 p343 Prometheus Books, Amhurst NY.
In connection with the treatment of Jews under Islam after the early years of the faith, a letter written from Egypt by the Jewish philosopher Maimonides (physician to Saladin’s Vizier) to the Jews of Yemen, faced with imminent forced conversion in the late 1100’s is revealing :
‘Remember, my co-religionists, that on account of the vast number of our sins, God has hurled us into the midst of this people, the Arabs, who have persecuted us severely, and passed baneful and discriminatory legislation against us…Never did a nation molest, degrade, debase and hate us as much as they… Although we were dishonoured by them beyond human endurance, and had to put up with their fabrications, yet we behave like him who is depicted by the inspired writer, ‘But I am as a deaf man, I hear not, and I am a dumb man that openeth not his mouth’ (Psalm 38:14)
The Treatment of Dhimmis
Islamic ‘tolerance’ was the tolerance of the herdsman for his milch cows. The Dhimmi (Non-moslem forced to pay the Jizya tax, imposed only on them) was never allowed to forget his humiliating status:-
Submitting the Jizya Tax
‘The capitation tax is a sort of punishment inflicted upon infidels for their obstinacy in infidelity…, whence it is that it cannot be accepted of the infidel if he sends it by the hands of a messenger, but must be exacted in a mortifying and humiliating manner, by the collector sitting and receiving it from him in a standing posture; (according to one tradition, the collector is to seize him by the throat and shake him, saying, ‘pay your tax, Zimmee!’). - Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi, The Meaning of the Qur’an,vol 2 (Lahore Pakistan: Islamic Publications,1993) P183
‘[I]n the payment of the jizya, or poll tax, the qadi, on receiving the money, must make as if to give the dhimmi a light slap in the face so as to remind him of his place’.
- Lois Gardet, La cite musulmane: vie sociale et politique, Etudes Musulmanes Paris (reprint 1995)
The Systematic Grinding Down of Non-Moslem Populations
Dhimmis were systematically ground down for centuries. Here is a passage outlining the position of Dhimmis, including Jews, for 12 centuries until relatively recently:
‘The indigenous peoples of the Middle East and North Africa were gradually reduced-through pillage, ransom, exploitation, oppression, dispossession, forced conversion, famine and physical elimination – from majorities to helpless minorities. Their everyday life was governed by countless oppressive rules‘
‘In an age of violence, the law forbade them to carry arms. Lifting a hand against a Muslim, even in a case of legitimate defence was a capital offence. In an age of injustice, their sworn testimony was refused by Muslim courts. They were more defenceless than the humblest animal, protected by nature with a self-defence mechanism… Their blood was considered of an inferior quality to that of Muslims and could be shed lightly. Dhimmis rarely appealed for justice before the 19th Century. To complain of pillage, murder or massacre frequently provoked collective reprisals, thereby reminding the Dhimmis of their proper place.
‘Dhimmis were often considered impure and had to be segregated from the Muslim community. Entry into holy Muslim towns, mosques and public baths as well as certain streets, was forbidden to them. Their costumes, belts, shoes and the appearance of their wives and their servants had to be different from those of Muslims in order to expose and humiliate them, for the Dhimmis could never be allowed to forget that they were inferior beings.
‘Dhimmis could ride only on donkeys and outside towns. They had to dismount on meeting a Muslim as a sign of respect…. Dhimmis were forced to walk on the left or impure side of a Muslim. Their gait had to be rapid and their eyes lowered. .. Their graves had to be level with the ground so that anyone could walk on them…
- Bat Ye’or, Editions de l’Avenir, Geneva for World Organisation of Jews from Arab Countries, April 5th 1970.
Other rules, many enforced on pain of death, required that Dhimmis
The History of Dhimmitude has influenced Modern Islamic Thinking on Israel and the Jews
The changeover from Dhimmi to Israeli (the Jew liberating his land from Arab domination) has traumatised the Arab political consciousness. Why? Because Arab-Muslim domination and the resultant feelings of superiority were confirmed by the abasement of the Dhimmi.
If however the Dhimmi can obtain equal rights, the superior feels himself doubly inferior and therefore humiliated .
The psychological trauma was particularly vivid for the Arabs of Palestine where the treatment of the Jewish remnant was often more severe than anywhere else. ‘The less the Israeli image of the Jew fits into the Dhimmi stereotype – a servile, cowardly, debased being – the more violent and bloodthirsty will become the efforts of the ancient oppressors to enforce the victims to fit into a preconceived, discriminatory mold’.
- Bat Y’eor. Op Cit
It is maintained in the Arab media that if Jews have been persecuted at all times and in all countries, they have deserved it. Hitler had been perfectly justified in gassing and burning them. (If he did. The Iranian President has said that the Holocaust is a myth). If anything Hitler should be blamed for letting some of them survive.
Thanks to Jewish efforts in bringing about multiculturalism and multiracialism in the West, whatever the surface reasons, fundamentally in order to improve their own position, they have inadvertently or stupidly encouraged the importation of millions of their deadliest enemies.
The rise in anti-semitic incidents in Britain and the West can be attributed to Islam. And as the demographics quite possibly dictate an eventual Islamic takeover of our country and Western Europe in general, they can look forward to more and more of the same.
And what, thanks to the ineffable weakness and treachery of our rulers they have brought on themselves, they have also brought on the rest of us.