Tim Haydon

07

Jan

2012

Fraser Nelson, the Spectator, Daily Telegraph and Stupid Racial Optimism

Written by Tim Heydon

Diane Abbott is a 'Racist' and so are we all

Yes, Diane Abbott is a ‘racist’.  Why should that not surprise anyone?  Because everyone is a ‘racist’, at least to some extent.  Even those who make a point of cosying up to other races; who tell you about how much they socialise with and like other races, are ‘racist’, because in so doing they are acknowledging that races exist and are noting their own involvement with them as ‘other’.  At some level, they feel 'different' and deny this feeling for ideological, religious or some other reason.

Even those who have children by other races are ‘racists’.  White women (almost always lower working class or underclass) who have sexual relations with blacks (and miscegenation in Britain is mostly on these lines), are attracted by physical and personality characteristics peculiar to blacks and because, as Dr David Starkey pointed out to much abuse from the usual suspects, having been deliberately deracinated and taught to despise their own culture, they are now ‘culturally black’.

If someone denies being a ‘racist’ they are lying, either to themselves or to others.  You can only not be a ‘racist’ if you do not notice someone else’s race.  If you do notice it you will adopt some kind of attitude because of this perception (‘racism’) and it is psychologically impossible for a normal person not to notice race.

Why are we prejudiced?

Why are we prejudiced towards people, ie pre-judge them because of their race?  Because that is how humanity thinks.  We get an impression of the characteristics of any group (not ncessarily racial) however we define it to ourselves, and we judge individuals belonging to that group accordingly.  The more we are acquainted with the group in question, the more refined our prejudice (not necessarily negative) becomes.  One observes, constructs a theory and then tests it against reality.  It is science in action.  So don’t knock prejudice.

If we weren’t prejudiced, we would have been eaten

‘Ah’, someone might say ‘but why don’t you judge individuals as you find them?’  Well, human beings haven’t got time for that.  If our ancestors had judged each individual lion on its merits, they would all have been gobbled up.  So evolution has devised prejudice as a means of self – preservation.  And a very good one it is, too. It helps to preserve taxi-drivers, as we shall see.

The Racial Prejudice of Taxi Drivers is well-founded

When Diane Abbott identifies racial groups with certain behaviours she is ‘racist’ and also quite possibly correct, since as is perfectly obvious to those not blinded by egalitarian ideology, the different races do indeed tend to exhibit different behavioural characteristics.  Correct up to point when she says that whites have a tendency to ‘divide and rule' – that is a strategy which is not necessarily peculiar to whites – and  correct when she says that taxi drivers will tend not to pick up blacks.

Attacks on Taxi-Drivers by Blacks and Others

We have no details about attacks and other offences against taxi drivers by ethnic groups in London, where Abbott lives, but we do have them for New York which, like London, has a large black and immigrant community.  A New York cabby is 49 times more likely to be assaulted or murdered by a black or other non-white than by a white passenger (Heather Macdonald, ‘Nation of Cowards’, City Journal 19 Feb 2009).

If cabbies in New York do not wish to pick up black passengers, especially at night, it is for very good reasons.  And there is no good reason for thinking that London, where as Abbott says, blacks have trouble getting taxi drivers to stop, is essentially different in this respect.

As ‘Manxman’ points out, ‘The most recent analysis of the British Crime Survey shows that in 2004, focusing on violent racial attacks, 49,000 black and ethnic minority people were victims.  Among whites, the number was 77,000.  In the most serious categories of violent racist attacks (those that involved wounding or murder) 4,000 were BME.  Among the white population it was 20,000.  Those last figures are particularly amazing.  In the most serious categories of racist attacks the 10% or so of England's population who are not white commit 80% of the most violent racist attacks.’ (Source)

The Reality of Modern – Day Britain.

This is the reality of life in modern – day Britain which Fraser Nelson, Editor of the Spectator, tells us in an article in the Daily Telegraph (Jan 6th 2012) overflowing with the purblind complacency we have come to expect of him is ‘a nation at ease with itself’ about race.

But Nelson thinks that we in Britain trust our neighbours increasingly with ethnic diversity.  Do we really?  He quotes a ‘massive study’, probably the  one organised by the New Labour government which shows this (No surprise there).  This study is contradicted by the obvious facts of everyday behaviour, like those of taxi drivers and the fact that as racial aliens achieve critical mass in an area, the native British leave.  The area where your writer lives is full of refugees from now-black and Asian areas of East London.  Not much evidence of trust of ethnically diverse neighbours there, is there. 

What seems to have happened with Nelson's survey is that those whites who disliked  living in proximity to ethnic aliens had already left such areas by the time this survey, which was restricted to them,  was undertaken.

Why the BNP has not succeeded according to Fraser Nelson

Fraser Nelson thinks that the BNP has not succeeded because it does not understand Britain which is 'at ease with itself' racially.  But he does not understand that the BNP has failed, not because of the lack of possible support, for which there is ample evidence, (eg ‘One in four would consider voting BNP’ www.telegraph.co.uk › News › Politics, ‘Opinion poll: more than half of British voters think the BNP 'has a point' blogs.telegraph.co.uk › News › Politics › Damian Thompson etc) but because of the ineptness, sordid nature and nazi taint of the BNP leadership.

The Leftist Toryism of the Daily Telegraph and the Spectator

Detailing GCSE results, Fraser Nelson goes on to argue that the real divide in Britain is not colour but poverty.  The excuse that poverty is to blame for the poor results of blacks and white boys is pure egalitarian leftism.

There is today no fundamental connection between poverty and academic success.  Overall, and taking into account the vicious anti-white male bias of the culturally marxist teachers of white boys (and their other biases), the real connection between ethnicity and academic and socio-economic success is inherent abilty /race.  Here are the conclusIons of Richard Lynn, Professor Emeritus, University of Ulster regarding the socio-economic status of the races in Britain:-

Richard Lynn and the Racial Hierarchy in Britain

‘The Racial hierarchy in Britain follows the IQ gradient.  Jews have the highest IQs and are the most successful socio-economically.  The Chinese also do well with a high IQ and excellent educational attainment, and high rates of employment with low rates of crime.  The Indians are a bit of an anomaly because their IQ is somewhat lower than that of whites, but have a good educational attainment and socio-economic status…. The Pakistanis and Bangladeshis are a social problem group with low IQs, poor educational attainment, low earnings, high unemployment and a high rate of crime amongst the men.  (Lynn thinks that some of these problems are attributable to many of these people being recent immigrants with a poor command of English). 

‘The Afro-Caribbeans and the Africans are at the bottom of socio-economic hierarchy with low IQs, poor educational attainment, low earnings and high unemployment with high rates of crime and single teenage mothers.  There is no sign of improvement in their position during the period from the 1970's to the present.  In fact their performance in GCSE examinations worsened over the years 1988 -2004’...

'The racial hierarchy in Britain is similar to that in Canada, the USA and a number of other countries where the blacks have the lowest IQ and are the principle social problem group, while Jews and East Asians (Chinese and Japanese) are the model minorities who perform better than whites.  (The Global Bell Curve. p110. Washington Summit 2008).'

Brazil, like Britain 'the nearest approach to racial paradise'? Not really

Among these 'other countries' is Brazil, which after WW2 was often claimed to be a model of racial harmony, with no racial discrimination to speak of, just as Fraser Nelson claims Britain is today, in fact.  The Brazilian sociologist Gilberto Freyre (1945 p9) claimed that ‘race relations in Brazil are ‘probably the nearest approach to paradise to be found anywhere in the world’.  Subsequent study by, inter alia, Unesco proved otherwise.

In Brazil, where there has been much more  miscegenation than in Britain, race poisons and grossly exacerbates socio-economic divisions, tensions and resentments.  Just as it is going to do in Britain which must also have to deal with the increasing influence of racially-linked Islam and  its probable  takeover in the lifetime quite possibly  of  Fraser Nelson's  children - if he has any.

The presence in Britain of a significant and rapidly expanding Islamic minority  which shows no sign of wishing to integrate, is on its own already changing the flavour of life in this country, and not for the better. It is already throwing its weight around and demanding (and getting) special privileges for itself. As its  numbers and strength increases, things can only get worse. 

How 'at ease with itself' does this nincompoop think the country is  going to be as the native British progressively become a minority in their own country, to be at the mercy of blacks, asian moslems and other ethnicities, most of whom bear historic grudges against us and in some cases, such as Turks and Kurds, Hindus and Moslems,  Arabs / Moslems and Jews,  Blacks and Asians, against each other as well?

Fraser Nelson, take note.

Share this post