Thank you to all those who commented on the previous article.
There is nothing so arrogant as the Liberal Left who seek to judge without understanding the context of the people and time period they are addressing.
The Crusades are regarded by many of the left as a war crime, in a similar manner the right demonise Bomber Command for previous actions.
Such is the nature of history that by definition it has occurred previous to our existence. There is nothing that we can do about it, except report the facts as we understand them and decide on our own view.
There is an issue with the information we are receiving which may be erroneous by design, or accident (disinformation by the media, or needing further research).
But we are by our very nature, arrogant in our judgement of who have gone before us. Which may mean that I should elaborate. A case in point is the murder of six million Jews. Regardless of the argument over numbers no one asks the most obvious question:
What would induce sane rational people to murder millions of people?
Regardless of the crime, we could say the same of Rwanda or Russia, maybe the answer to the question would not be to certain peoples liking.
We assume that double standards are a modern phenomena, why for example has Mandela, Mugabe and Blair not been tried for war crimes?
It is clear from past experience that the victor does not get tried for war crimes, the few exceptions include Lieutenant Morant.
The answer is that legislation changes as developments in war are made. The Hague Convention of today has been amended on numerous occasions. What are crimes today were not regarded as such a century ago.
Only the Jewish state continues to prosecute war criminals at a time when most are in government.
We forget that the State of Israel invented modern terrorism, and atrocities were committed by all sides in what was a dirty war. We also ignore the fact that the United States funded Irish terrorism for decades.
So war crimes and war criminals are selective, why did certain people get away with murder, and others not.
The two simple answers to this are a lack of information (Russian Archives) which has since been made public or political expediency, an example of this includes German scientists and Japanese nobility.
War Crimes Today
I have mentioned the convicted terrorist Mandela, but the IRA and others who have been involved in the murder of women and children continue to thrive.
It is not arrogant to understand the hypocrisy of total war.
The war in Ulster is total war because it is designed to destroy an ethnic group, the Ulster Loyalist. Yet the people who perpetrated this extermination were supported by the firemen and police of New York City.
Which is why I do not grieve for 9/11. How can the USA go to war with a group or organisation when they themselves supported the PIRA?
The genocide of the White European in Africa is of a similar nature, yet the Liberal is silent.
Imagine if the White government had killed people in a similar nature, they would be in the Hague faster than a cheetah on speed!
Many people including myself believe that John Smith and David Kelly were assassinated to facilitate the plan now being enacted. The Queen eluded as much in her now famous Annus Horribilis speech, where she spoke of dark forces. It is pure conjecture to believe that Princess Diana was killed in the same way yet it remains plausible.
The genocide of the white European in Europe, which we are currently experiencing can be considered a war crime. Yet unless we are successful do we seriously believe that after we are gone anyone will be prosecuted.
Finance is behind everything, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, maybe it has always been so.
Financial Plans are in motion, maybe since before the start of the 20th Century, and many people know that the elite (now termed the 1%) are gathering enormous wealth on the backs of ordinary people.
The Left are not the answer, as their leaders were bought years ago in the same way that many on the right have succumbed to dark forces.
Never in our history has so much wealth and power been gathered in the open light for all to see, but only the few to understand.
The purpose of total war is defined in many articles including this one here
But it can be put in simpler form by saying that you use the nations total resources to destroy the enemy.
So after fifty years of German hating, we should be embracing our European brothers, and uniting with all the nationalists of Europe.
The enemy is and has used every resource (media/Educators/Common Purpose), there is more, in a total war to exterminate the European peoples.
They have killed and continue to kill, we should not underestimate our enemy.
We are in the here and now, and the enemy is real. Not the German or British serviceman of World War Two. He or she is the globalist, multiculturalist, closet socialist, and all his chums from Eton and abroad.
They are far more deadly than a bombing raid on Dresden, or Coventry for that matter. They have killed more people.
So step from the past and move forward into the future, a united Nationalist future.
1. We declared war on Germany in World War One and Two, but they declared war on America in WW2.
2. Germany used nerve gas against Poland in 1939.
3. The USA threatened an embargo of oil on Japan, which was the principle reason for the attack on Pearl Harbour.
4. The Chinese have lost more people in war than any other nation.
5. The Chinese under Mao killed approximately forty million people, The Russians under Stalin killed twenty million. I wonder why its never mentioned in the media!
6. One in five Australian and New Zealand soldiers who enlisted in World War One never returned.
7. A common British slang term for cigarettes in the First World War was Coffin Nails.
8. The French Entente Cordiale was a secret treaty, we went to war in World War one to protect Belgian neutrality.
9. Germany had a better housing policy than Great Britain before World War One.
10. Prior to World War One Britain and Germany were the most cultured countries in Europe and German troops were part of the British Army for thirteen years.