Elite Commander
The movement must be radical
-
Written by Elite Commander
Recently my views on the necessity of a moderate message as opposed to a radical one changed somewhat.
This may have had something to do with the furore over David Icke's nonsense and the responses made to it, but the repeated failure of moderate or 'fluffy' organisations, especially Britain First, to take off in any meaningful way has certainly contributed.
The new-found success of the Golden Dawn is of course equally important.
Last night, I was struck with not a logical proof but what I see as a systematic demonstration of the necessity of radical nationalism. My thought process was very similar to the nine points listed in order below. If anyone finds fault or agreement with them, I would be happy to see their responses in the comments section below.
I have also provided a short explanation of each point beneath the main list.
Why the nationalist movement must be radical:
- For as long as the current political establishment holds power, our nation is doomed to ruin.
- As nationalists we must act against the destruction of our nation.
- Therefore the current political establishment must be removed from power.
- In order to ensure our national salvation the establishment must be replaced by an exclusively nationalist government.
- Therefore the goal of all nationalists must be to attain a nationalist government.
- This has proven to be an exceptionally difficult goal.
- Difficult goals require great effort and great sacrifice in order to achieve them.
- People will not make large sacrifices for meagre gains; however desirable a moderate solution might be, radical outcomes are necessary in order to justify radical sacrifice.
- Therefore the movement must be radical.
For as long as the current political establishment holds power, our nation is doomed to ruin.
This point is abundantly clear to every nationalist. The relentless flood that is mass immigration – the annual import of some half a million foreign people – threatens to permanently transform and destroy our country unless it is reversed within perhaps two decades at most.
As nationalists we must act against the destruction of our nation.
The endorsement of, or failure to act against, the destruction of one’s own nation is a moral outrage and a crime against nature.
Therefore the current political establishment must be removed from power.
This fact is evidenced by the first point; our nation can never escape destruction while traitors hold influence.
In order to ensure our national salvation the establishment must be replaced by an exclusively nationalist government.
It is not sufficient only to destroy or remove the current political establishment since it may then be replaced by any other ambitious movement which may be equally as destructive as the old regime. The nationalist movement must generate people who are ready to step up to the responsibility of government as soon as an opening is found.
Therefore the goal of all nationalists must be to attain a nationalist government.
Knowing that a nationalist government is absolutely necessary if our nation is to avoid destruction, no sincere nationalist can have any aim less ambitious. To compromise our aspirations is to admit defeat.
This has proven to be an exceptionally difficult goal.
Despite decades of activism, speaking, donating, voting, marching and protesting, our country is as far from a nationalist government as it has have ever been. Our goal must be of incredible difficulty if our movement is not of abysmal competence; probably both are true to some degree.
Difficult goals require great effort and great sacrifice in order to achieve them.
The establishment will not relinquish power without extreme resistance. Leafleting and marching will not bring it down; more powerful methods must be employed.
People will not make large sacrifices for meagre gains; however desirable a moderate solution might be, radical outcomes are necessary in order to justify radical sacrifice.
The greater the expected outcome, the more effort a person is likely to put in. We cannot expect our people to make major contributions and sacrifices for a mere moderate solution. There is passion and meaning in true nationalism, but not in ‘reducing immigration to the tens of thousands’.
Therefore the movement must be radical.
