Wikipedia the internet Encyclopaedia was the brainchild of Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger. Since Sanger parted ways with Jimmy Wales in 2002 he has been critical, among other things of its accuracy. In December 2004, Sanger wrote a critical article for the website KuroShin, in which he admitted that there had existed "a certain poisonous social or political atmosphere in the project"
This could explain why Wikipedia states quite wrongly, in fact inversely that the BNP’s Ideology is Fascist when in reality its political and social Ideology is the exact opposite, in truth 190 degrees diametrically opposed to that of Fascism. I am not going to discuss the internal political wrongs and rights of the BNP other than to say it is a Nationalist movement and I do not believe for one moment they are a plant by MI5 as some other people have suggested.
Wikipedia was launched in January 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger. Sanger coined the name Wikipedia, which is a portmanteau of wiki (a type of collaborative website, from the Hawaiian word wiki, meaning "quick") and encyclopaedia.
Wikipedia as an Internet Encyclopaedia does not inform me that the European Union is the embryo of a Marxist Dictatorship or words descriptive of the birthing of a Totalitarian Society orchestrated in Brussels or of its position as a Global entity, when all indications screams that it is.
So bias and misinformation by omission does exist and one has to question the politics of Wikipedia editors, many I suspect might be Oxbridge University educated, academic drones who are already far left leaning by default, due to their tutor’s distorted political view of the world. It is here the truth or lack of it rears its ugly head and where things can go horribly wrong, almost all of its articles can be edited by anyone with access to the site, and it has about 100,000 regularly active contributors.
An edit to an article becomes available immediately, prior to any review so it is open to vandalism and mischievousness and as such an article may contain inaccuracies, ideological biases, or even patent nonsense, until or unless another editor corrects the problem, which would account for ridiculous inaccuracies that the BNP’s ideology is Fascism when in effect it is the exact opposite. It was a viewpoint by Alan Ginsburg that said ‘he who controls the language, the images, controls the race’.
None were more aware of this powerful social control than Joseph Goebbels, who was Hitler’s Reich Minister of propaganda. Much of the WW2 propaganda campaign film is held in the BBC archives.
Even today none is more aware of the power of social control than the Government who through its mouthpiece the BBC experiment with a new form of Propaganda using Television. If I appear to write broadly in a derogatory way of the BBC I do not refer their world class classic nature documentaries, Period Drama, and criminal exposes and the like, but I have no doubt the government have placed political infiltrators in critical positions who are in senior positions in News, Current Affairs, and Talks departments. A typical example being BBC’s hypocrisy was revealed in the now infamous spiteful episode of a stacked Question time.
The BBC has made misinformation by omission, bias and mind shaping using subliminal visual messages an art form which is blindingly apparent with mind numbing ‘Soapies’ where it is common-place to see White Females co-habiting sexually with Africans, Asians and Caribs, not as prostitutes which I could quite justifiably understand when it’s a commercial transaction, a sexual transaction that has been taking place since ‘Camp Followers’ followed the armies of Hannibal over the Pyrenees and the Alps but giving the impression it is a ‘normal’ part of the Anglo Saxon or Northern European social structure, which it is not, nor ever has been.
Miscegenation with races of lower I.Q’s and different codes of moral and cultural behaviour is not only devastatingly fragmenting but if allowed to continue could eventually sound the death knell of the European races.
Which brings me to my next thread, ‘’SAMSUNG’S SMARTVIEW’’ .
It was going to be a matter of time when all video you see on your PC will be able to be viewed on your large TV, with the ability of downloading apps to the TV.
The days the Controllers of People have the monopoly to decide to broadcast what THEY want you to see and in what content they want you to see it are numbered. The establishment are terrified of the power of the Internet and they will I am sure try to censor aspects of it that doesn't fit into their agenda. We have been saying for years that Nationalisms biggest problem is getting the message out to the people, but Smartview just might be our saviour. At the moment Smartview TV is relatively expensive but like all technology the price over time will come down.
Imagine instead of sitting down to an evening of numbing TV fare consisting of The Biggest Loser, East Enders, The X Factor, and Home and away, hours and hours of cooking and mindless Quiz shows, you can watch thousands of top documentaries on YouTube.
For instance, how Money is created out of thin air. Who exactly is the Reserve Bank of America? What is a Straw man? and the position of Jewish influence in American politics and their disproportionate influence on the written word on world events and world finance. The real purpose of the Creation of the EU, not the propaganda the EU claptrap portrays. The alternate version of 9/11, conspiratorial or not, Common Purpose, the true reason for wanting to deport Julian Assange to America, the truth being to close down Wikileaks once and for all, and America’s illegal in wars in the Middle East and elsewhere and the Jews involvement in the war in Serbia. There are thousands of such programmes on YouTube.
There are many first class well researched documentaries on YouTube which the public cannot be bothered to watch via a small screen or on their Laptop but they would be more likely to watch these programmes from the comfort of one’s lounge TV.
Imagine just once or twice a week watching a pre-recorded Nationalist Broadcast. A short intro, followed by picking the teeth out of important world news events, not plagiarising the content ad verbatim but rewriting copy from news sites like Russia today, Al Jazeera etc., including Nationalist news items sent in from around Europe, news the BBC will not touch with a barge pole, UK news naming ethnicity of Paedophiles, revealing the MSN bias of overseas news stories, revelations on criminal goings on re politicians expense accounts in Westminster and of local immoral council conflicts of interests and white racism.
Many people would prefer to watch Russia today in preference to the BBC; I cannot see why a Nationalist channel could not have the same appeal. The presentation of this Nationalist TV channel has got to look professional and slick employing a presenter with a good speaking voice preferably without a heavy regional accent. ……or face tattoos.