Albion
Is our land really a land fit for Heroes?
-
Written by Albion
They are just names proudly emblazoned across many British Regimental flags but they can in no way describe the terror or the blood that was spilt on foreign battlefields and of families torn apart, the price paid in exchange for accepting The Kings Shilling.
It was at the Battle of Isandlwana where the 1st Battalion 24th foot were massacred at the hands of the Zulus, the British were wiped out.
On a whim of Lord Chelmsford who considered the independent Zulu Kingdom ruled by Cetshwayo a threat to the British colony of Natal with which it shared a long border along the Tugela River, 860 British soldiers out of a force of 1200 were slaughtered. Then there was Rorkes Drift, Alma, Sevastopol, Mafeking, Ladysmith, Kabul, Alma, Inkerman, Balaclava, Trafalgar, Waterloo and a hundred other wars on foreign soil and countless lives lost at sea.
Great Britain’s young men died fighting rich men’s wars to secure trade routes or to preserve the spheres of influence of the Empire, its aristocracy, the industrialists and the British elite. These soldiers mostly from the peasantry were poor, uneducated and dispensable and today little has changed in that they still fight on foreign soil in wars of no threat to the mother country.
That tells me the aristocracy and the established elite still hold political, financial and economic power. So are we witnessing a class struggle in this country?
What is happening in the UK is a situation unknown in its long proud history. What you are witnessing that is taking place in Britain today, you may give it any extreme left driven name you like but it is relentlessly destroying this country and changing the face and character of a great nation forever.
The British soldiers who were massacred at the battle of Isandlwana wore red coats and white helmets, their opponents wore loin cloths, carried spears and stolen rifles. The Union Jack was the rallying point. Our soldiers recognised their enemy, our enemy today is within and concealed.
They are from the same class of people who will accuse you of racism for flying the Union flag, the same flag that 680 English soldiers were slaughtered and sacrificed under at Isandlwana by order of the Generals who attempted to steal another tribes land as were thousands if not millions of other young men and women that have died for political expediency in foreign wars, our leaders then have the sheer audacity to feign mock grief at wreath laying ceremonies for the TV cameras.
Have we at any time in our history sheltered so many traitors in this country?
How do you remove a nation’s identity and at the same time remove their sole claim to their country? In the days of Empire one would say that would be an impossibility. OUR politicians have achieved this. They shared our collective name of 'British people' with the rest of the world and flooded the country with foreign people, at the same time enacting legislation to make it a crime if our people object.
There will come a day, and very soon, when we will have as much claim to this island as Tibetans have with Tibet. Meanwhile the Britons, a once proud, warlike nation sleep on. They have been cowed, terrified then castrated.
Let us dissect what constitutes a dictatorship. It might take different forms, ours is a Benign Dictatorship. Basically it comprises a single party state, generally referred to as the ‘LibLabCon’ as a single party state it is Plutocratic, Totalitarian, Oligarchic and Statist. It poisons any chance of our nation's survival by the day.
Plutocracy.
Plutocracy is rule by the wealth, or power provided by wealth, the combination of both plutocracy and oligarchy. Wikipedia tells us that one modern, perhaps unique, formalised example of a plutocracy is the City of London. The City (not the whole of modern London but the area of the ancient city, which now mainly comprises the financial district) has a unique electoral system. Most of its voters are representatives of businesses and other bodies that occupy premises in the City.
Oligarchic.
According to this school of thought, modern democracies should be considered as oligarchies. In these systems, actual differences between viable political rivals are small, the oligarchic elite impose strict limits on what constitutes an acceptable and respectable political position, and politicians' careers depend heavily on unelected economic and media elites. Thus the popular phrase: there is only one political party, the incumbent party.
Oligarchy is a form of power, governmental or operational, where such power effectively rests with a small, elite group of inside individuals, sometimes from a small group of educational institutions, or influential economic entities or devices, such as banks, commercial entities that act in complicity and in the UK, complicity within the hierarchy of the police.
Totalitarian. (or totalitarian rule) is a political system where the state recognizes no limits to its authority and strives to regulate every aspect of public and private life wherever feasible. Totalitarian regimes stay in political power through an all-encompassing propaganda disseminated through the state-controlled mass media, a single party that is often marked by personality cultism, control over the economy, regulation and restriction of speech and mass surveillance as in the UK employing 4.2 Million surveillance cameras and the use of its police to enforce an ideology, in the UK that ideology is Multiculturism and the race laws were brought in solely to stifle any resentment to this criminal act.
Statism.
The ideology of statism espoused by fascism holds that sovereignty is not vested in the people but in the nation state, and that all individuals and associations exist only to enhance the power, prestige and well-being of the state. It repudiates individualism and exalts the nation as an organic body.
Tyranny of the majority. The phrase "tyranny of the majority" (or "tyranny of the masses"), used in discussing systems of democracy and majority rule, is a criticism of the scenario in which decisions made by a majority under that system would place that majority's interests so far above a dissenting individual's interest that the individual would be actively oppressed, just like the oppression by tyrants and despots. Limits on the decisions that can be made by such majorities, such as constitutional limits on the powers of parliament here I refer to exchanging our constitution for a foreign one, the major accusation of a Dictatorship is a country having a one party political system which effectively we have in the UK combined with accusations of rigged elections.
A One Party State.
We do not live in a Democracy as there is no alternative choice at the ballot box. Successive polls have shown the greatest concern our people have is the continual onslaught of immigration, the desire for a referendum on remaining in the European Union, jobs for British workers and here when I write British workers I do not mean Polish, the selling of our infrastructure and the destruction of our industries. The concerns are noted but if the electorate wanted to vote for a party that offer an alternative, any alternative they cannot because all three parties have identical policies, so we are governed in effect by a one party state, there are no other political options. THAT IS A DICTATORSHIP but without the Gulags.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH
So how do you remove a Dictatorship?
Firstly one should read Gene Sharps book ‘From Dictatorships to Democracy’ http://tinyurl.com/efsgg to understand how to dismantle an authoritarian regime in a non-violent way.
Many aspects of this book were used to trigger what is called the Arab Spring and removing their despotic regimes. Even Iran’s dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was so threatened by the book he banned it and accused Sharp of causing unrest in Iran and being in the pay of the FBI. Sharp works in a tiny office in a major city and only employs a young mixed race girl as his assistant who appears to idolise him. He is frail 83-84 year old of extreme intellect.
Removing a benign dictatorship however calls for a different approach, like the Arab Spring revolution it is a mixture of people power and civil disobedience but most importantly as Gene Sharp advocates without the VIOLENCE. I assume this condition only being met unless and until the British Police start shooting at their own people.
I have included the URL above. The book is essential reading and I will not even begin to précis its contents. It is a free download and I guarantee you will find it hard to put down. I would like to say to Britain First or indeed all Nationalist groups that they ,should base their strategy on Gene Sharps many years of research on bringing down despotic regimes, and a regime cannot be more despotic that one that deliberately tries to destroy its own nation.
I am sure the authorities and common purpose would like to see the book banned …..Or burnt. It should be treated as the Patriots Bible. It can be likened as the required pacifist reading in answer to the Anarchist Cookbook.
“People it is simple; you have been sold, shafted, betrayed and hoodwinked by your politicians for years.”
